-

Introducing The Revolutionary And New- "Misalignment Theory": That: First,Tobacco neither infects nor cause cancer. Second,Cancer is an immunological problem. Third, It is caused by misaligned armpit/groin. Fourth,root causes of misalignment: sin, pride and ignorance. Fifth,Simplistic cure for CANCER : Corrective realignment of the armpit/groin or drugs to free the obstructed passage of the immune system. PART FOUR: MISALIGNMENT AND CIGAR AND CIGARETTES TOPICS: 70. "IS THERE TRUTH THAT CIGARETTES AND LIQUORS ARE HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH , CAUSING THE DREADED CANCER OF OUR TIME? 71. "SMOKING THEORY ": ANOTHER DARWINIAN THEORY IN THE MAKING? 72. "THE 'MISALIGNMENT THEORY' OF DIVINE HEALING PITTED AGAINST THE SECOND-HAND SMOKE THEORY" 73. "MISALIGNED PERSON CAUSING HIS OWN CANCER RAISES LEGITIMATE FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES" 74. "DOES TOBACCO SETTLEMENT IN U.S.A. SOLVE CANCER PROBLEM?" 75. TRUTH IN THE "MISALIGNMENT THEORY" CAUSING CANCER "WILL SET US FREE!" 76. "IS SMOKING HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH?" 77. "WHY PASSIVE SMOKING ,ONE OF THE MOST UNSCIENTIFIC THEORIES OF SCIENCE?" 78. "SMOKING IS NOW DANGEROUS TO MAN" 79. "WHEN MAN COUGHS...."    "IS THERE TRUTH THAT CIGARETTES AND LIQUORS ARE HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH, CAUSING THE DREADED CANCER OF OUR TIME?       In U.S.A., the tobacco industry is on the run. The tobacco firms are sued by the federal and state governments for damages by way of refund the burden of the health care/services rendered by them to their citizenry. They are not only made to shoulder the expenses of advertisement against them, but are all required by the Federal Drug Administration [FDA] to comply with the "nicotine requirement." Private individuals, alleged victims of "secondhand smoke" are now suing and winning. And ultimately, tobacco firms would be facing multiple damage suits, left and right, in every state of U.S.A.       Sooner, the liquor industry may be next in the line. In public places, in government and in private offices smoking is prohibited and several areas are now declared "no-smoking" areas/zones. But any ban to this effect, is meaningless and toothless, unless it carries with it, some sanctions such as, fines, suspension or imprisonment.       Cigarettes by their nature have "nicotine" and to remove it they would cease to be cigarettes. Just as liquors have alcohol, as essential ingredient, and naturally, to remove it, they would cease as such. Incidentally, in the Philippine Congress several pending Senate and House bills [SHB Nos. 675,379, HB Nos. 520,6680,etc.] prohibiting advertising in the media of liquor and cigarettes and prohibiting smoking in public places are, however, gathering "dusts", for political reasons- they feared the retaliatory action of the tobacco voters/growers of the north [Ilocos Regions].       In U.S.A., the tobacco industry, being cornered and forced with court cases, the outrage of the general public , the proliferation of embarrassing billboards/ advertisements, the rigidity of reducing nicotine requirement of FDA, effected some settlements, after some executives of the tobacco industry, admitted that some "American smokers died of cancer." They hope also that the settlement may "immunize" them from the various suits to be filed by the private sectors against them in the days to come.       By that admission/settlement do cigarettes really cause cancer? We doubt.       However, before tackling the controversial issue, whether or not smoking is causal to present day cancer, we present emphatically, the incontrovertible disadvantages/ hazards of smoking:       First, the indiscriminate throwing of lighted cigarette butts are fire hazards to "inflammable" materials/places.       Second, their butts, ashes and accompanying saliva[indiscriminate spitting, sputum, hemoptysis, etc.] littered, unsanitized and "blighted" many public and private places.       Third, smokers made themselves "nuisances" to non-smokers who cannot take offensive smells of the smoke especially those suffering with some misalignment[i.e., third/fourth ribs and sternum] which render them prone to bronchial /asthmatic problems.       Fourth, they "discolored" the teeth, mouths , lips , fingers, hands and clothing of the smokers; darkened skin due to" hazing."        Fifth, they, not only emit unwelcome bodily odors, but also, pollute the air conditioners and public/private rooms with "bad and offensive tobacco odors".       Sixth, they complement/augment "addiction" when the prohibited/regulated drugs are taken by the users thereof through smoking thereby creating grounds for annulment of marriage or legal separation in some countries -i.e. in the Philippines under the existing Family Code drug addiction and other vices(drinking, etc.) are among the valid grounds for annulment of marriage or legal separation.       Seventh, the preferential attitude of habitual smokers to succumb to their vices, necessarily, and eventually, deprive the other members of the family of the much -needed food and other necessities of life. Coming to the main issue,       Does smoking really cause cancer?       An initial NO answer may probably, dishearten many, who have built-in resistance against smoking and for many years been educated to consider smoking as dangerous and hazardous to health. Nevertheless, "truth" has its own price to pay. Incidentally, the herein writer is a non-smoker.       Inspite of so many gigantic well-funded researches in the past years, the men of science are still losing in their fight against cancer: they failed to find the specific causes of cancer and the accompanying affordable and simplistic cure. In brief, from scientific point of view, cancer is still " incurable" ,with some "experimental" cure/therapy to content with, momentarily. To justify any progress of their cancer research, the men of science surprisingly, pinpointed some "whipping boys" and "token" suspects of cancer -- the "cigarettes" for lung/throat cancer and "liquor" for cirrhosis(liver).       Medical/religious books, magazines and journals cited smoking and drinking as the causes of lung/throat/liver cancer. But since science could not find specific cure for these types of cancer, they conceive of banning and regulating smoking/drinking/eating. As initial step, they are now punishing the tobacco industry and perhaps, someday , the liquor/salt/sugar/food industry will be next in the line , although, not necessarily, in that order.       Is the trend of science and government correct?       No, because the scientific approach, as also adhered to by the government, is the "outside" of man, not "within" or the "inside" of man.       Admittedly, with smoking and cancer as criteria, we can categorize people into three types or categories, namely:        First, There are many people who are smokers but do not suffer lung/throat cancer;       Second, Some few smokers who died of cancer.       Third, many non-smokers who contacted/ died with the dreaded lung/throat cancer.       Using the logical reasoning of renown historical logician, Mr.John Stuart Mills [Mill's Canon] his well-known canon the "method of agreement" or his "method of difference", it is very clear that smoking does not cause cancer because of this irrefutable phenomenon: many smokers without cancer and their counterpart, many non-smokers with cancer.       Disregarding pure logic and common sense reasoning, science, instead of correctly concluding that smoking does not cause cancer, they invented and coined the so-called "second- hand smoke" theory and even to the extent of instilling fear or "health scare" to the general public by considering the "smoke" to be more dangerous than actual smoking in order to justify two imaginary situational cases: one, that smoking is the sole cause of lung/throat cancer; and two, to include the non-smokers suffering cancer in the expanded coverage of the "secondhand smoke" theory.       Is secondhand smoke theory scientific? Divine Healing discerned it to be the most "unscientific"; hence, erroneous, devoid of scientific basis.       Ignorance is better than false education.       God is truth! Back | Home | Next

Internet Resources

Geocities.com Click Here to Join and be a part of the Geocities Community! Yahoo.com Free Email Service for life! ; Largest search engine online; Mactan.i-p.com Free Email Service Javascriptcity.com JavascriptCity is all you need for your javascript needs, in one place! - Get Free Online Tutorials, Script Samples & links to other useful sites! Yehey.com Yehey! search engine, free e-mail and other stuff.